Contact

Fraternal Order Authority serves researchers, historians, prospective members, journalists, and community organizations seeking reference-grade information on the structure, history, and operations of fraternal orders across the United States. This contact page explains how to direct inquiries to the appropriate channel, what geographic scope the resource covers, what details to include in a message, and what response timelines are realistic. Understanding these parameters before reaching out reduces back-and-forth and accelerates useful replies.


How to reach this office

Inquiries are accepted through the site's web-based contact form, accessible from any page footer. The form routes messages into a single queue reviewed by the editorial and research staff responsible for this resource. No telephone line is maintained for general public inquiries, consistent with the operational model of a reference-grade authority site rather than a service provider.

Three categories of contact are recognized:

  1. Editorial corrections — Factual disputes, sourcing questions, or requests to update information in a specific article. Reference the page title and the specific claim in question.
  2. Research and reference inquiries — Questions about fraternal order history, legal classification, membership structures, or organizational governance that fall within the documented scope of this site. Topics covered in depth include fraternal order legal status and nonprofit classification, lodge structure, and types of fraternal orders in the US.
  3. Partnership and content collaboration — Requests from historians, nonprofit organizations, academic departments, or verified fraternal order bodies seeking to contribute sourced material or establish an informational relationship.

Messages that do not fall into one of these 3 categories — including requests for legal counsel, membership referrals, or lodge contact information for specific local chapters — are outside the scope of this resource and will not receive substantive replies.


Service area covered

Fraternal Order Authority operates at national scope within the United States. The site's reference content addresses organizations chartered under US law, governed by US nonprofit statutes, or operating lodges in at least 1 of the 50 states. This includes nationally federated bodies such as the Fraternal Order of Police, the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, the Knights of Columbus, and the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, as well as college Greek-letter fraternities governed under the National Interfraternity Conference (now the North American Interfraternity Conference, or NIC) framework.

International fraternal bodies — including Freemasonry's Grand Lodge structures operating outside US jurisdiction — are referenced only when they intersect directly with US organizational history or US-chartered lodges. Inquiries concerning exclusively foreign fraternal law, foreign lodge governance, or non-US regulatory frameworks are outside the primary service scope and may receive limited responses.

State-level regulatory questions — for example, those touching on 501(c)(8) or 501(c)(10) tax-exempt status as defined under the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 501 — are addressed in general educational terms, not as jurisdiction-specific legal guidance.


What to include in your message

A complete inquiry contains 4 discrete elements that allow the editorial team to triage and respond efficiently:

  1. Subject classification — State which of the 3 contact categories (editorial correction, research inquiry, or collaboration) the message falls under.
  2. Specific reference point — Name the article, page slug, or topic area the question concerns. Vague inquiries such as "I have a question about fraternities" require at least one clarifying reply before substantive engagement is possible, which delays resolution.
  3. Source or basis for the question — If disputing a factual claim, cite the competing source. Named public sources — for example, the IRS, the US Census Bureau, a state secretary of state's office, or a published academic work — carry more weight than anecdotal accounts.
  4. Organizational affiliation, if relevant — Journalists, academic researchers, and representatives of fraternal bodies should identify their affiliation. This allows the editorial team to prioritize responses to institutional inquiries and to apply appropriate verification standards.

Messages missing elements 1 and 2 are the single most common reason inquiries receive delayed or partial responses.


Response expectations

The editorial queue is reviewed on a rolling basis, with a target first-response window of 5 to 7 business days for categorized inquiries. Editorial correction requests that reference a specific page and a named competing source are typically processed within that window. Research inquiries requiring cross-referencing against primary documents — such as the constitutions and bylaws of national fraternal bodies, or IRS determination letters — may require up to 14 business days.

Response priority is assigned as follows:

Priority Level Category Typical Response Window
High Editorial corrections with cited source 3–5 business days
Standard Research and reference inquiries 5–7 business days
Extended Complex historical or legal research Up to 14 business days
Low Collaboration and partnership proposals 10–21 business days

Inquiries sent without the 4 required elements described in the section above are placed in a pending queue and will receive a single request for clarification. If no clarification is received within 10 business days, the inquiry is closed without further action.

Responses are provided in written form via the email address supplied in the contact form. No telephone callbacks are offered. Substantive replies constitute editorial research assistance, not legal, financial, or membership advice — a distinction aligned with the site's classification as a reference resource under principles outlined by the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics governing accuracy and source transparency.

Report a Data Error or Correction

Found incorrect information, an outdated fact, or a broken link? Use the form below.

📜 1 regulatory citation referenced  ·   · 

References